MLB Lines: Giant’s Budget Cuts

Share News

MLB Lines and News

Giants’ Offseason Plans Hit by Budget Cuts and Financial Strain

The San Francisco Giants enter the 2024 offseason with notable budget constraints under the leadership of Buster Posey, the franchise’s new president of baseball operations.  After spending $206 million last season, the Giants are expected to implement austerity measures, reducing their adjusted payroll. This will downgrade their MLB Lines. This change means the Giants’ offseason budget will be limited, possibly allowing only an additional $30-40 million for new contracts after covering current commitments. 

While the Giants intend to improve their roster through free agency and trades, the budget limits make it unlikely they’ll pursue a significant star like outfielder Juan Soto.

The Giants are also open to exploring potential trades to increase financial flexibility. Arbitration-eligible players like LaMonte Wade Jr. ($4-5 million), Camilo Doval ($3 million), and Mike Yastrzemski ($9-10 million) are among the possible trade candidates. 

This need for flexibility comes as the Giants face ongoing operating losses and budget adjustments following last year’s investment in players like Jorge Soler, Matt Chapman, and Blake Snell. Although these deals were valuable then, they contributed to the Giants exceeding the luxury tax threshold for the first time since 2018, imposing tax obligations and limiting future signing flexibility.

Giants’ Attendance and Revenue Challenges

Despite increased attendance in 2023, with an average of 2,231 more fans per game, the Giants’ revenue growth lagged due to discounted ticketing strategies that reduced total income. Though fortunate to have a secure revenue stream through their 25-year contract with NBC Sports Bay Area, the Giants’ operating losses remain a concern for ownership. 

The financial setbacks have led the team to downsize some operations, with cuts in departments such as scouting, as they attempt to manage their budget responsibly under Posey’s leadership.

Posey, who values sustainable growth, declined to comment on specific payroll reductions but expressed an interest in balancing the short- and long-term goals. Giants chairman Greg Johnson reiterated this sentiment, explaining that the franchise doesn’t operate with a fixed budget but adjusts spending as trades and free agent opportunities arise. Johnson emphasized a commitment to a competitive team and acknowledged the organization’s economic challenges.

Implications for Free Agency and Draft Positioning

The Giants’ 2023 spending spree has left them with lingering luxury tax impacts, especially regarding free agents with qualifying offers (QOs). If the Giants sign a free agent with a qualifying offer this offseason, it would cost them their second and fifth draft picks, plus $1 million from their international bonus pool. These draft penalties could be a significant deterrent for a team focused on development.

Other challenges include competition for middle infielders and pitchers. The Giants might consider infielders like Ha-Seong Kim, free from draft pick compensation, a more viable target. Kim, recovering from shoulder surgery, remains in high demand, partly due to his strong relationship with Giants manager Bob Melvin from their time together in San Diego.

The Giants could explore veteran pitchers such as Justin Verlander or Nathan Eovaldi. While Verlander brings star power, Eovaldi, who declined his $20 million option with the Rangers, might be a more financially realistic choice for the Giants. Despite being a free agent, Snell is unlikely to be pursued due to financial constraints and past spending decisions.

Ultimately, Posey’s tenure as president will hinge on strategic roster management and prudent financial decisions. If the Giants aim to return to postseason success, much of that journey will rely on Posey’s balanced approach. Although former president Farhan Zaidi’s tenure saw mixed results, his careful roster handling has left the Giants with a foundation of young talent.