Paul Dans, former director of Project 2025, has strongly criticized Donald Trump's campaign's strategy ahead of the 2024 presidential elections. According to Dans, the former president should be leading in the polls, but certain tactical errors have allowed the race for the White House to be tighter than it should be. He questions the lack of preparation for Democratic moves and the absence of a solid strategy against Kamala Harris's candidacy as some of the factors contributing to this uncertain scenario.

The 2024 U.S. presidential election has become even more competitive following last night's debate between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump. Both candidates aimed to sway undecided voters, and the latest PBS News/NPR/Marist poll reflects the intense competition. Trump has made gains among key voter demographics, making the race even tighter.

Donald Trump, former President and current candidate for the 2024 election, wasted no time making waves after last night’s much-anticipated debate with Vice President Kamala Harris. Just one day later, Trump has intensified his focus on sexual misconduct allegations, a move that is once again shaking up the Presidential Election odds.

As one of the most anticipated debates of the presidential race approaches, Vice President Kamala Harris has agreed to the rules imposed by ABC for the debate with Donald Trump, despite her campaign team initially showing strong opposition. The controversy revolved around the network's decision to mute the microphones when it wasn’t a candidate’s turn to speak. Harris's team believed this measure would disadvantage the Vice President by limiting her ability to confront Trump directly, an opponent known for his aggression and ability to dominate the stage.

In a vibrant campaign event in Pennsylvania, Vice President Kamala Harris reiterated her opposition to selling U.S. Steel to the Japanese company Nippon Steel. In front of a crowd of unionists celebrating Labor Day in Pittsburgh, Harris highlighted the strategic importance of keeping U.S. Steel under American control, stating that maintaining strong steel companies is vital for the economy, national security, and the well-being of thousands of workers.